UCI outlaws speed gel in three days after Lotto-Soudal uses it to a 3rd place in the Dauphine TTT.
Could the fact that UCI has yet to take any action on Froome's 42% over on Salbutamol be used as a precedent for another rider testing high, the arguing that he should get the next 8 months of racing "free" with all results standing? He could point out that UCI can and does take action quickly when they feel it matters.
The cynic in me sees UCI thinking bottom line, that repeat TdF winners and highly funded teams are far more important than Lotto-Soudal. Things look a little better at UCI than in 2000-2006 but I am tasting some of the same flavor.