April 19, 2024
Login
Home
News
Ride Maps
Blogs
Forums
Gear
Resource
VeloTV
Photos
Unanswered
Active Topics
Forums
Search
Forums
>
Road
>
Road Cycling
Nice article in The Economist
Last Post 11/15/2013 05:08 PM by SideBy Side. 7 Replies.
Sort:
Oldest First
Most Recent First
Prev
Next
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author
Messages
Yo Mike
Posts:338
11/14/2013 12:19 PM
...referencing another good article in the NYT......
http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2013/11/cycling-v-cars
cycling-v-cars
Orange Crush
Posts:4499
11/14/2013 12:40 PM
It nicely sums up the paradigm shift that needs to happen wrt liability. Not just car/cycling incidents but also pedestrian.
RNDDUDE
Posts:78
11/15/2013 10:58 AM
Getting into a car is basically putting on a 2 ton suit of armor, and by rights you should be responsible for a heightened sense of awareness when dealing with people less suitably equipped (cyclists and pedestrians). Traffic laws should not grant one immunity from liability. The Netherlands does it right.
Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistant one. -Albert Einstein
Yo Mike
Posts:338
11/15/2013 12:20 PM
Holy shht....it is 'open season' on cyclist and pedestrians in NYC! Cars rule without repercussion.
The
Bike Snob
weighs in
and do not fail to read this link as well
cab-driver-who-maimed-tourist
Profoundly depressing. It seems that 'someone important' or their kid must be run down and maimed / killed by an auto before real change will occur.
SideBySide
Posts:444
11/15/2013 01:38 PM
That cab case is simply amazing. That should be two counts of assault with a deadly weapon, at least.
Oldfart
Posts:511
11/15/2013 04:15 PM
In BC strict liability is imposed in car pedestrian accidents. That means a car driver has to prove he was not negligent. Normal liability places the burden of proof upon the plaintiff. Perhaps that should be the case with car bike accidents too?
vtguy
Posts:298
11/15/2013 04:28 PM
I read the original article in the Times and was surprised by the comments of readers, many of whom, as pedestrians, had stories of near misses with a$$**** cyclists. They didn't go so far as to suggest that motorists were justified in running us down, but we cyclists don't have a lot of residual good will among some of the people who responded. If this is the sentiment of Times readers, I can only imagine what it would be at, say, the Omaha World Herald.
SideBySide
Posts:444
11/15/2013 05:08 PM
In the cab incident, no-one is worried about the bike messenger that the cab drove through to get to the tourist, only the tourist.
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Road
--Professional Racing
--The Dark Side
--Road Cycling
--Gear Advice
--New Cyclists
--The Coffee Shop
--Training Talk
--The Ride Spot
Off-Topic
--Off-Topic
Mountain Bike
--MTB - New Riders
--Gear Advice
--The Ride Spot
Cyclocross
--Racing
--Gear Advice
--Training
Commuting
--General Discussion
Forums
>
Road
>
Road Cycling
Active Forums 4.1
NOT LICENSED FOR PRODUCTION USE
www.activemodules.com
Latest Forum Posts
Flanders (and Roubaix)
posted in Professional Racing
Anyone have fun bike projects going?
posted in The Coffee Shop
so quiet
posted in The Coffee Shop
Hot Stove League
posted in Professional Racing
Rohan Dennis charged in death of his wife
posted in Professional Racing
compare Cycling icons with icons in other sports
posted in Off-Topic
Parc des Princes Veldrome
posted in Professional Racing
No articles match criteria.
Terms and Conditions
|
Privacy Policy
Copyright 2008-2013 by VeloNation LLC
About
Advertising
Mission
Contact
Jobs
Content
Pro Cycling News
General Cycling Articles
Training and Health
Gear Reviews
Community
Directory
Blogs
Photos
Forums
Groups
VeloTV